<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="fr">
<title type="text/plain">L&apos;ACTUALITÉ DES WIKIS</title>
<tagline type="text/plain">Un projet coopératif pour construire le PointWiki</tagline>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"/>
<author>
<name>Youssouf CHOTIA</name>
<url>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com</url>
</author>
<info type="application/xhtml+xml" mode="xml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Prototype of an Atom 0.3 feed based on <a href="http://www.mnot.net/drafts/draft-nottingham-atom-format-02.html">
http://www.mnot.net/drafts/draft-nottingham-atom-format-02.html</a>.
This feed may change, use at your own risk.
</p></div></info>
<generator url="http://viabloga.com">ViaBloga</generator>
<modified>2008-10-29T03:06:08Z</modified>
	<entry>
		<title>Delegate to Decrease Occupational Spam</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

In response to my article in Forbes on Email Hell, my friend Richard Titus made a spot on comment:This is great. I also employ several email tools (ClearContext, x1) to try and reduce the &quot;occupational spam&quot; that&apos;s a critical part of the BBC culture [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/delegate-to-decrease-occupational-spam"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/delegate-to-decrease-occupational-spam</id>
		<issued>2008-10-29T02:28:00Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-10-29T02:28:00Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">In response to my article in Forbes on Email Hell, my friend Richard Titus made a spot on comment:This is great. I also employ several email tools (ClearContext, x1) to try and reduce the &quot;occupational spam&quot; that's a critical part of the BBC culture [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Meeting Hell</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

Meetings are a big productivity killer that you can control by working together better.  Studies have shown the cost of meetings, you probably spend a week per month in meetings, and you can calculate your own cost of meetings. The issue isn&apos;t just where you spend your team&apos;s time, but how you spend it [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/meeting-hell"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/meeting-hell</id>
		<issued>2008-10-19T18:39:39Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-10-19T18:39:39Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">Meetings are a big productivity killer that you can control by working together better.&nbsp; Studies have shown the cost of meetings, you probably spend a week per month in meetings, and you can calculate your own cost of meetings. The issue isn't just where you spend your team's time, but how you spend it [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Hello Socialtext 3.0!</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

This morning Socialtext launched Socialtext 3.0, a trio of applications for connected collaboration with context:

Socialtext People - Social networking for the enterprise
        

Socialtext Workspace - Group-editable wiki for easy, flexible, enterprise-wide collaboration
         

Socialtext Dashboard - Customizable home pages that let each person
          decide where to focus their attention.


Socialtext 3.0 delivers connected collaboration with context, both internally within the organization and externally with customers and partners in extranet communities. It is built on a modular and integrated architecture that enables rapid integration with other enterprise systems and makes other enterprise applications social [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/hello-socialtext-3-0"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/hello-socialtext-3-0</id>
		<issued>2008-09-30T14:52:29Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-09-30T14:52:29Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">This morning Socialtext launched Socialtext 3.0, a trio of applications for connected collaboration with context:

Socialtext People - Social networking for the enterprise
&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 

Socialtext Workspace - Group-editable wiki for easy, flexible, enterprise-wide collaboration
&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;

Socialtext Dashboard - Customizable home pages that let each person
&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; decide where to focus their attention.


Socialtext 3.0 delivers connected collaboration with context, both internally within the organization and externally with customers and partners in extranet communities. It is built on a modular and integrated architecture that enables rapid integration with other enterprise systems and makes other enterprise applications social [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Lifetracking is the new Group Therapy and iQuit</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

Monica Hesse of the Washington Post has one of the most interesting and enjoyable reads of the year, Bytes of Life.  Its on the subject of Lifetracking.  Unlike Lifestreaming, its not sharing information, but data.  Using services to collect and capture data about the otherwise mundane, share it, compare it and make sense of it [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/lifetracking-is-the-new-group-therapy-and-iquit"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/lifetracking-is-the-new-group-therapy-and-iquit</id>
		<issued>2008-09-09T05:09:19Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-09-09T05:09:19Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">Monica Hesse of the Washington Post has one of the most interesting and enjoyable reads of the year, Bytes of Life.&nbsp; Its on the subject of Lifetracking.&nbsp; Unlike Lifestreaming, its not sharing information, but data.&nbsp; Using services to collect and capture data about the otherwise mundane, share it, compare it and make sense of it [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Wikis and Document Management Systems</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

Michael Idinopolus has a good post exploring the differences and complements of wikis and document management systems....The
two activities get confused because document management, like
collaboration, involves creation of content by multiple people. For
many companies, the DMS is the first tool they implemented that enabled
more than one person to touch a single, centrally stored piece of
content. And the document management vendors began to capitalize on the
opportunity by introducing document-centric team rooms (like
Documentum&apos;s eRooms, for example.) As a result, many companies began to
use the DMS as a collaboration tool. The DMS wasn&apos;t very good at it. It
required every piece of collaborative content to be saved as a
document. Search was cludgy or non-existent, and everything had to be
filed in a nested folder structure. But it was better than nothing, or
email.

Last week I saw first-hand a good example of this
phenomenon recently at a major executive search firm. They wanted a way
to collaboratively publish questions, comments, slides, bios, etc., and
engineered an entire intranet around eRooms. It was cludgy, and adopted
primarily by power users who took the time to create a Byzantine
taxonomy of folders and sub-folders.

All of which brings me back
to my meeting with the retail bank. When asked about the relationship
between DMS and collaboration tools, what I said was that some of the content in a typical DMS really belongs there. These are the documents associated with highly regulated processes. But most
of the content in a typical DMS--to-do lists, meeting notes, press
clippings, conversations, working papers, personal
observations--doesn&apos;t really belong there. It&apos;s in the DMS because
there was no good place to put it. That&apos;s where a collaboration suite
can do a much better job. A good collaboration suite can liberate that
content from the tyranny of documents and nested folders, and will
encourage people to use it for actual working materials...He goes on to discuss integration and conclude by saying &quot;Use
your document management system to manage documents, and use your
collaboration suite to collaborate.&quot; Which is obvious unless you are stuck between systems as most people are these days.

But something else occurred to me when reading this passage:Collaboration, by contrast, is all about people working
together to share ideas, notes, questions, comments, etc. Collaboration
does not typically follow a standard process; it is much more free-form
and free-flowing. Documents are not typically the format of choice.
Asking a question or creating a meeting agenda or to-do list doesn&apos;t
require a document; it just requires typing some words and putting them
where other people can see and edit them. That&apos;s why so many people
simply fire off an email when they collaborate; it spares them the
unnecessary step of creating a document.I&apos;ve written a lot about how we bend email into everything, and Michael says things need less bending with emails than documents.  But I don&apos;t think I&apos;ve emphasized enough the transition from document-centric to message-centric to people-centric [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/wikis-and-document-management-systems"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/wikis-and-document-management-systems</id>
		<issued>2008-09-09T03:15:54Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-09-09T03:15:54Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">Michael Idinopolus has a good post exploring the differences and complements of wikis and document management systems....The
two activities get confused because document management, like
collaboration, involves creation of content by multiple people. For
many companies, the DMS is the first tool they implemented that enabled
more than one person to touch a single, centrally stored piece of
content. And the document management vendors began to capitalize on the
opportunity by introducing document-centric team rooms (like
Documentum's eRooms, for example.) As a result, many companies began to
use the DMS as a collaboration tool. The DMS wasn't very good at it. It
required every piece of collaborative content to be saved as a
document. Search was cludgy or non-existent, and everything had to be
filed in a nested folder structure. But it was better than nothing, or
email.

Last week I saw first-hand a good example of this
phenomenon recently at a major executive search firm. They wanted a way
to collaboratively publish questions, comments, slides, bios, etc., and
engineered an entire intranet around eRooms. It was cludgy, and adopted
primarily by power users who took the time to create a Byzantine
taxonomy of folders and sub-folders.

All of which brings me back
to my meeting with the retail bank. When asked about the relationship
between DMS and collaboration tools, what I said was that some of the content in a typical DMS really belongs there. These are the documents associated with highly regulated processes. But most
of the content in a typical DMS--to-do lists, meeting notes, press
clippings, conversations, working papers, personal
observations--doesn't really belong there. It's in the DMS because
there was no good place to put it. That's where a collaboration suite
can do a much better job. A good collaboration suite can liberate that
content from the tyranny of documents and nested folders, and will
encourage people to use it for actual working materials...He goes on to discuss integration and conclude by saying &quot;Use
your document management system to manage documents, and use your
collaboration suite to collaborate.&quot; Which is obvious unless you are stuck between systems as most people are these days.

But something else occurred to me when reading this passage:Collaboration, by contrast, is all about people working
together to share ideas, notes, questions, comments, etc. Collaboration
does not typically follow a standard process; it is much more free-form
and free-flowing. Documents are not typically the format of choice.
Asking a question or creating a meeting agenda or to-do list doesn't
require a document; it just requires typing some words and putting them
where other people can see and edit them. That's why so many people
simply fire off an email when they collaborate; it spares them the
unnecessary step of creating a document.I've written a lot about how we bend email into everything, and Michael says things need less bending with emails than documents.&nbsp; But I don't think I've emphasized enough the transition from document-centric to message-centric to people-centric [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Leadership and Management of Distributed Collaboration, and the Rise and Fall of the Chief Community Officer</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

Last week I was on a panel at Office 2.0 discussing &quot;who owns community?&quot;  Organizational Development was just one topic we explored, and ZDnet has a brief video except.  In this post, let me clarify my comments.

Leadership in Distributed Organizations

My CEO Eugene Lee was recently an executive at Adobe and Cisco.  The transition over the past year wasn&apos;t just from Bigco to Startup.  Half of Socialtext&apos;s employees are distributed across four continents.  Eugene recently observed that &quot;in a distributed organization, leadership matters more than management [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/leadership-and-management-of-distributed-collaboration-and-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-chief-community-officer"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/leadership-and-management-of-distributed-collaboration-and-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-chief-community-officer</id>
		<issued>2008-09-07T18:51:20Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-09-07T18:51:20Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">Last week I was on a panel at Office 2.0 discussing &quot;who owns community?&quot;&nbsp; Organizational Development was just one topic we explored, and ZDnet has a brief video except.&nbsp; In this post, let me clarify my comments.

Leadership in Distributed Organizations

My CEO Eugene Lee was recently an executive at Adobe and Cisco.&nbsp; The transition over the past year wasn't just from Bigco to Startup.&nbsp; Half of Socialtext's employees are distributed across four continents.&nbsp; Eugene recently observed that &quot;in a distributed organization, leadership matters more than management [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Bust to Boom?</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

There is no doubt there are tight times for tech entrepreneurs in the US &amp;amp; UK right now, but there are substantive differences between the current climate and the big bust.  Richard Waters of the Financial Times explores this in his piece Back to Bust?  I&apos;m quoted briefly on how things have changed [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/bust-to-boom"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/bust-to-boom</id>
		<issued>2008-08-20T22:49:55Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-08-20T22:49:55Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">There is no doubt there are tight times for tech entrepreneurs in the US &amp; UK right now, but there are substantive differences between the current climate and the big bust.&nbsp; Richard Waters of the Financial Times explores this in his piece Back to Bust?&nbsp; I'm quoted briefly on how things have changed [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Broken Business Processes Contribute to Email Overload</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

Ramon Padilla from Tech Republic picked up on a quote of mine from a Christopher Lynch interview:â€ (Employees) spend most of their time handling exceptions to business
processes. Thatâ€ s what they are doing in their inbox for four hours a
day. E-mail has become the great exception handler.â€ In Ramon&apos;s article he explores how did we get here and why has it happened.  Here are the headlines of the five points he explores.
Making it up as we go along. 

Not enforcing business processes. 

Business processes that are not automated or automated with software that is outdated or doesnâ€ t fulfill the userâ€ s needs. 

 Lack of communications within an application or integration with other communication mechanisms. 

Lack of communication alternative besides e-mail.

If you would like to learn more about this issue, please help me by voting on Fast Company&apos;s The Killer Pitch for this story:

Most people don&apos;t
dispute that they suffer from email overload. A recent report from
Basex in the NYTimes revealed that people spend 28% of their day
interrupted by things like unnecessary email. However, what we do about
our overload is a source of much debate.

Socialtext
has connected the dots between a few reports to discover that a great
deal of our email comes from handling exceptions. Because business
processes don&apos;t have a system to translate them into practice, we spend
more than a quarter of our day emailing about the exceptions to the
business process rules. Worse than the volume of email is the
amount of mental energy required by each email recipient, ergo worker,
to parse each exception and determine what to do with it. E-mail was
once intended to increase productivity and has now become so voluminous
it is counter productive. Basex determined that business loose $650
billion in productivity due to the unnecessary email interruptions. 
And, the average number of corporate emails sent and received per
person per day expected to reach over 228 by 2010.  Socialtext
has been building out business practice support using their
customizable Enterprise 2.0 platform to return email back to its
rightful place in the communication stratigraphy,  which is not as the
catch-all for exception handling. Their business social software makes
the process more productive, reducing email by 30%. With the growth in
the remote workforce, global coverage, proliferation of mobile devices,
and social technologies; collaboration is the solution to improve the
effectiveness of communication and address these forces.Personally, I think we should win because our pitch uses the word stratigraphy. 

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/broken-business-processes-contribute-to-email-overload"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/broken-business-processes-contribute-to-email-overload</id>
		<issued>2008-08-19T00:29:38Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-08-19T00:29:38Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">Ramon Padilla from Tech Republic picked up on a quote of mine from a Christopher Lynch interview:â€œ(Employees) spend most of their time handling exceptions to business
processes. Thatâ€™s what they are doing in their inbox for four hours a
day. E-mail has become the great exception handler.â€In Ramon's article he explores how did we get here and why has it happened.&nbsp; Here are the headlines of the five points he explores.
Making it up as we go along. 

Not enforcing business processes. 

Business processes that are not automated or automated with software that is outdated or doesnâ€™t fulfill the userâ€™s needs. 

 Lack of communications within an application or integration with other communication mechanisms. 

Lack of communication alternative besides e-mail.

If you would like to learn more about this issue, please help me by voting on Fast Company's The Killer Pitch for this story:

Most people don't
dispute that they suffer from email overload. A recent report from
Basex in the NYTimes revealed that people spend 28% of their day
interrupted by things like unnecessary email. However, what we do about
our overload is a source of much debate.

Socialtext
has connected the dots between a few reports to discover that a great
deal of our email comes from handling exceptions. Because business
processes don't have a system to translate them into practice, we spend
more than a quarter of our day emailing about the exceptions to the
business process rules. Worse than the volume of email is the
amount of mental energy required by each email recipient, ergo worker,
to parse each exception and determine what to do with it. E-mail was
once intended to increase productivity and has now become so voluminous
it is counter productive. Basex determined that business loose $650
billion in productivity due to the unnecessary email interruptions. 
And, the average number of corporate emails sent and received per
person per day expected to reach over 228 by 2010.  Socialtext
has been building out business practice support using their
customizable Enterprise 2.0 platform to return email back to its
rightful place in the communication stratigraphy,&nbsp; which is not as the
catch-all for exception handling. Their business social software makes
the process more productive, reducing email by 30%. With the growth in
the remote workforce, global coverage, proliferation of mobile devices,
and social technologies; collaboration is the solution to improve the
effectiveness of communication and address these forces.Personally, I think we should win because our pitch uses the word stratigraphy. </blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Diplopedia</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

The New York Times has an article about the U.S. State Department&apos;s Diplopedia.  Eric M. Johnson of the State Departmentâ€ s Office of eDiplomacy shared his learnings during the Wikimania conference in Egypt (video accessible if you use Internet Explorer, sigh) [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/diplopedia"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/diplopedia</id>
		<issued>2008-08-04T19:18:46Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-08-04T19:18:46Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">The New York Times has an article about the U.S. State Department's Diplopedia.&nbsp; Eric M. Johnson of the State Departmentâ€™s Office of eDiplomacy shared his learnings during the Wikimania conference in Egypt (video accessible if you use Internet Explorer, sigh) [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>XPertNet SARL a 4 and et devient XWiki SAS</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

J&apos;ai publiÃ© un article sur les 4 ans d&apos;XPertNet sur le blog d&apos;XWiki.
L&apos;organisation de l&apos;augmentation de capital, de l&apos;Ã©quipe et le business m&apos;ont beaucoup occupÃ© ces temps ci, ce qui ne me fait blogger qu&apos;occasionnelement.
Mais je ...

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/xpertnet-sarl-a-4-and-et-devient-xwiki-sas"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/xpertnet-sarl-a-4-and-et-devient-xwiki-sas</id>
		<issued>2008-08-04T09:38:28Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-08-04T09:38:28Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[LudoBlog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">J’ai publiÃ© un article sur les 4 ans d’XPertNet sur le blog d’XWiki.
L’organisation de l’augmentation de capital, de l’Ã©quipe et le business m’ont beaucoup occupÃ© ces temps ci, ce qui ne me fait blogger qu’occasionnelement.
Mais je ...</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>4 ans de CoopÃ©ratique. 2004 - 2008 : qu&apos;est-ce qui a changÃ© ?</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

Eh oui, aujourd&amp;#8217;hui l&amp;#8217;entreprise Coopératique fête son anniversaire. Trois ans, et même 4 si l&amp;#8217;on compte à partir de la création du blog ! L&amp;#8217;occasion de revenir sur ce qui a changé durant cette période.
En 2004, ma motivation pour créer le blog était de comprendre mon sujet d&amp;#8217;investigation, les wikis, en pratiquant les usages participatifs [...]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/4-ans-de-coopa-ratique-2004-2008-qu-est-ce-qui-a-changa"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/4-ans-de-coopa-ratique-2004-2008-qu-est-ce-qui-a-changa</id>
		<issued>2008-08-04T07:11:39Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-08-04T07:11:39Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Cooperatique.com]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">Eh oui, aujourd&#8217;hui l&#8217;entreprise Coopératique fête son anniversaire. Trois ans, et même 4 si l&#8217;on compte à partir de la création du blog ! L&#8217;occasion de revenir sur ce qui a changé durant cette période.
En 2004, ma motivation pour créer le blog était de comprendre mon sujet d&#8217;investigation, les wikis, en pratiquant les usages participatifs [...]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Who is on my team, anyway?</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

Larry Irons digs ups some old research to show that distributed collaboration isn&apos;t just about getting your team on the same page.  But figuring out who the team is in the first place.Those advocating Enterprise 2.0, especially wikis, may consider the benefits described back in 2002 by Mortensen and Hinds obvious [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/who-is-on-my-team-anyway"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/who-is-on-my-team-anyway</id>
		<issued>2008-07-08T15:34:41Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-07-08T15:34:41Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">Larry Irons digs ups some old research to show that distributed collaboration isn't just about getting your team on the same page.&nbsp; But figuring out who the team is in the first place.Those advocating Enterprise 2.0, especially wikis, may consider the benefits described back in 2002 by Mortensen and Hinds obvious [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Identi.ca Launches, an Open Source Twitter</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

Evan Prodromou, one of the better citizens of the wiki community and founder of WikiTravel, launched Identi.ca today.  Its a Twitter clone that is also distributed as Open Source licensed software.  I&apos;ve been playing with it in semi-private beta. Its made Dave Winer&apos;s day and Jevon is Canadian [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/identi-ca-launches-an-open-source-twitter"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/identi-ca-launches-an-open-source-twitter</id>
		<issued>2008-07-02T19:28:23Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-07-02T19:28:23Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">Evan Prodromou, one of the better citizens of the wiki community and founder of WikiTravel, launched Identi.ca today.&nbsp; Its a Twitter clone that is also distributed as Open Source licensed software.&nbsp; I've been playing with it in semi-private beta. Its made Dave Winer's day and Jevon is Canadian [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Socialtext Turns Wiki into a Killer Web Platform</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

Alexander Wolfe of Wolfe&apos;s Den on Information Week posted a video on Socialtext Turns Wiki into a Killer Web Platform, including footage of me demoing the latest stuff on the tradeshow floor of Enterprise 2.0:



</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/socialtext-turns-wiki-into-a-killer-web-platform"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/socialtext-turns-wiki-into-a-killer-web-platform</id>
		<issued>2008-06-26T04:06:33Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-06-26T04:06:33Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">Alexander Wolfe of Wolfe's Den on Information Week posted a video on Socialtext Turns Wiki into a Killer Web Platform, including footage of me demoing the latest stuff on the tradeshow floor of Enterprise 2.0:

</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Wiki Universal Edit Button</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

Yesterday at Supernova&apos;s Liquid Conversations panel I asked what people were doing to make a better and more usable user experience across tools.  There wasn&apos;t much of an answer.  Today, UniversalEditButton.org was launched.  Pete Kaminksi, my co-founder and CTO blogged about it: [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/wiki-universal-edit-button"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/wiki-universal-edit-button</id>
		<issued>2008-06-19T20:31:34Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-06-19T20:31:34Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">Yesterday at Supernova's Liquid Conversations panel I asked what people were doing to make a better and more usable user experience across tools.&nbsp; There wasn't much of an answer.&nbsp; Today, UniversalEditButton.org was launched.&nbsp; Pete Kaminksi, my co-founder and CTO blogged about it: [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Supernova: The Publius Project, The Internet&apos;s Constitutional Moments</title>
		<author>
		<name>cyouss</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="text/plain">Source : 

I&apos;m at my favorite conference today, Supernova.  At the first one we were inspired to found Socialtext.  Instead of going to the VC or consumer web panels, I thought I&apos;d learn a bit about a Berkman project.  Here&apos;s an impressionary transcript [..]

</summary>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/supernova-the-publius-project-the-internet-s-constitutional-moments"/>
		<id>http://pointwiki.viabloga.com/news/supernova-the-publius-project-the-internet-s-constitutional-moments</id>
		<issued>2008-06-17T18:22:05Z</issued>
		<modified>2008-06-17T18:22:05Z</modified>
		<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="fr" xml:base="http://pointwiki.viabloga.com"><![CDATA[<p>Source : [[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]]</p><blockquote class="remote_news_quote">I'm at my favorite conference today, Supernova.&nbsp; At the first one we were inspired to found Socialtext.&nbsp; Instead of going to the VC or consumer web panels, I thought I'd learn a bit about a Berkman project.&nbsp; Here's an impressionary transcript [..]</blockquote>]]></content>
	</entry>

</feed>
